![retina macbook memory upgrade retina macbook memory upgrade](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0wdM9doyzm4/maxresdefault.jpg)
Its Retina display is positioned as having four times the number of pixels of the iPad 2. The same thing happened with the new iPad. When the iPhone 4 came out, Apple talked about how ( as it still does now) the phone had four times more pixels than its predecessor.
![retina macbook memory upgrade retina macbook memory upgrade](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71eVw9HLcEL._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
In particular, Apple seems to be doing the same type of 4:1 ratio that it has used for its other Retina displays. They're being used to make what's displayed look better, not to make the screen have more overall real estate.
#Retina macbook memory upgrade pro#
There is a 2,880 by 1,800 pixel density that Apple calls the MacBook Pro Retina's resolution, which is being confused with the display resolution by some.Īll those pixels are being pumped into a 1,440 by 900 display resolution, by default. Despite what I keep reading repeatedly in various reviews, there is no 2,880 by 1,800 display resolution. That's what's happening with the MacBook Pro Retina. The new iPad was displaying the same real estate as before the extra pixels were being used to bring that real estate into better focus, to make it sharper, clearer. MG Siegler, expert in all things Apple, helped me understand through a Twitter conversation that the iPad wasn't upping the display resolution. If it had such a higher resolution, why wouldn't I see more on screen? After all, when I've bought monitors with higher resolutions over the years, I was always able to see more on them. I went through this myself, when the new iPad came out. There's confusion that I'm seeing all over the place between display resolution and pixel density. So where am I getting the 1,440 by 900 figure? And what about that 2,880 by 1,800 figure that's going around, not least on the MacBook Pro Retina's own product page?ĭisplay resolution versus pixel resolution You'll see these figures listed when you hover over each option except for the middle "Best (Retina) option." For that, nothing is shown. That's why, below the MacBook Pro image, you see text that says "Looks like 1920 x 1200." From left-to-right (or from "Larger Text" to "More Space"), the resolutions are: In the image above, I hovered over the "More Space" option on the right. When you hover over any of these choices, you're shown what the display resolution will be. To get to the higher resolutions (and some lower ones), go to System Preferences, then Display, then override the "Best for Retina display" choice and select "Scaled." That brings up five options: Out of the box, the MacBook Pro Retina will display the lowest of the three resolutions I've illustrated above. The MacBook Pro Retina gives you that extra room.īy default, the MacBook Pro Retina shows less, not more Anyone who uses multiple monitors understands how much more productive extra screen real estate like this can be.
#Retina macbook memory upgrade windows#
The highest resolution means you can read two articles side-by-side more easily or have any number of different windows open at the same time. This is the same native resolution for the regular 15-inch MacBook Pro or for the 13-inch MacBook Air. The bottom image is what you'll see on the MacBook Pro Retina's "native," or recommended, setting of 1,440 by 900 display resolution. The text in the second article gets cut off. You can see how I can no longer read both articles side-by-side. That's also a resolution offered by the regular MacBook Pro with the "Hi-Res" option. The middle image is when I dropped the resolution down to 1,680 by 1,050.
![retina macbook memory upgrade retina macbook memory upgrade](https://media.wired.com/photos/5932e2ef26780e6c04d2ddb1/master/w_2560%2Cc_limit/OElarpDkI1pqNeGW.jpeg)
I can easily read both articles side-by-side. Everything I could see on my desktop is shown.
![retina macbook memory upgrade retina macbook memory upgrade](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kMezuv0ubDA/maxresdefault.jpg)
The top image shows when I'm using the highest display resolution of 1,920 by 1,200. The comparisons below show how I've opened two different browser windows with articles from my Marketing Land Web site and how much you can see as you increase the display resolution: The MacBook Pro Retina goes beyond that with a 1,920 by 1,200 display resolution, matched by only a few other laptops out there.īut enough with the words here's an illustration of how much more you can show. One reason I purchased my 2010 MacBook Pro was because at the time, the computer's display resolution of 1,680 by 1,050 was higher than that of any other laptop I was considering then (others may have been higher, but they weren't on the shortlist of my personal options). I immediately headed for the settings area, to better understand how much more the 15-inch Retina screen could display versus the 15-inch screen on my 2010 MacBook Pro. My new MacBook Pro Retina arrived on Friday, far faster than I expected. Even if going big means less than "full Retina" quality, it's still a great benefit. But what's really impressed me is how much more the new screen can actually show on a single display. Yes, the MacBook Pro's Retina display does deliver the clarity we've seen from Retina on the iPhone and the iPad.